Fan Survey · Round Two
What content
should we produce
should we produce
Here's what you told us
Top of the report 60 second digest
Top-line stats and headline takeaways for anyone short on time. The detailed breakdown sits below.
82%
Want in-game stats and dashboards
22 points clear of any other format
65%
Want a weekly "players to know" roundup
The #1 confidence-builder by miles
63%
Want current and ex-player voices
17 points clear · pundits trail at 36%
76%
Want injury alerts on owned players
Personalised, not generic news
The headlines
Five things to take from this
01
Stats and dashboards demand towers above everything
82% definitely want in-game stats. The strongest content signal in the entire survey, by 22 points.
02
Lineups, injuries and team news is the editorial gap
Most-mentioned theme in your written answers (25%) and #1 gameweek pain point (70%). What you want here is real-time accuracy.
03
Player voices win, pundits trail
Current and ex-players are the universal anchor across every show type. 63% overall, 64–84% inside specific podcast formats.
04
The podcast you want has clear shape
Tactical and decision-focused (55%), under 30 minutes, weekly, with a Friday preview and a Sunday or Monday review. The official FPL podcast is the named benchmark.
05
A familiar mix of voices already covers women's football
When asked who you trust, you named ex-players, journalists, podcasts and creators in roughly equal measure. There isn't a single dominant source.
For the nerds like us All the detail
Every chart, cross-tab, and open-text theme. Read in any order, but the format Likert below is where the story starts.
Headline finding · Format appeal
Stats and dashboards are the runaway favourite.
82% definitely want in-game stats and dashboards, the strongest signal in the entire survey.
22 points clear of the second-place format. Just 3% are not interested.
You want the data inside the product, in front of you, when you need it.
In-game stats & dashboards: 82% definitely · 15% neutral · just 3% not interested
In-game stats & dashboards
82
15
82%
Articles
60
35
60%
Social
58
32
10
58%
Push notifications
45
39
16
45%
Email
45
41
14
45%
Podcasts
40
36
24
40%
Community hub
33
52
16
33%
5–20min video
30
42
28
30%
Live streams
27
40
33
27%
Definitely Neutral Not interested % labels show "Definitely" share
Theme #2 · Stats and data depth
There's no where to view statistics of the current season and how many points players have from goals, clean sheets etc. This needs to be easy to view, and not cover just the previous week.
Segment cut · The 38% who'd consume content every day
Daily consumers want community, social, podcasts and video. They don't want email.
38% of you would happily consume fantasy content every single day. Their content preferences differ noticeably from the average respondent.
Each row below shows two bars: dark for the average across all respondents, gradient for the daily group.
Take Community Hub: 43% of daily consumers definitely want it, against 33% of the average. So daily consumers want a Community Hub 11 percentage points more than everyone else.
A pre-weekend podcast and a weekend review podcast.From your written answers
Community hub
Daily +11 ppts
Average
33%
Daily
43%
Podcasts
Daily +10 ppts
Average
40%
Daily
50%
Social
Daily +10 ppts
Average
58%
Daily
67%
5–20min video
Daily +9 ppts
Average
30%
Daily
39%
In-game stats & dashboards
Daily +5 ppts
Average
82%
Daily
87%
Push notifications
Daily +3 ppts
Average
45%
Daily
48%
Articles
Daily +2 ppts
Average
60%
Daily
62%
Live streams
Daily +1 ppts
Average
27%
Daily
28%
Email
Daily −6 ppts
Average
45%
Daily
39%
Average across all respondents Daily consumers (the 38%) ppts = percentage points
Daily consumers over-index on every visual and social format. The notable signal is email, where they sit 6 percentage points below the average. The implication: don't try to serve them with a daily newsletter. Serve them with feeds, community, and shorter-form content.
01Where you get stuck
During a typical gameweek · pick top 3
Lineups, by a country mile.
70% · 14 points clear of #2
1
Confirmed lineups
70%
2
Deciding on transfers
56%
3
When to play chips
46%
4
Understanding BWSL2 players
33%
5
Picking my captain
26%
6
Predicting price changes
24%
7
Reviewing the gameweek
21%
8
Spotting differentials
17%
Lineups dominate. Transfers and chips form a clear second tier. Almost everyone is hitting their pain-point cap, which means responses are real and urgent, not noise.
When in the week you most want fantasy content
Friday · or every day.
Almost 2 in 5 want it daily
1
Friday, deadline prep
47%
2
Honestly, every day
38%
3
Midweek, planning ahead
25%
4
Thursday, early team news
23%
4
Matchday, rolling updates
23%
4
Monday, gameweek review
23%
7
Sunday, reactions
11%
Friday is the clear peak. The daily-consumer segment sits at 38% of the audience, with Midweek leading the rest of the week at 25% and Thursday, Matchday and Monday tied at 23%.
02Pain points × tools that fix them
Cross-tabulation · % of each pain group also asking for each tool
A live news feed solves nearly everything.
Each row shows what people stuck on that pain point also want as a tool. The darker the cell, the more of that group are asking for the tool.
The live news feed is the highest-asked tool across every pain group, scoring 57% to 74% no matter where you're stuck.
One sharp signal in the bottom-right: people stuck on price changes are nearly twice as likely to want a price predictor (48%) as the population overall (27%).
An injury and suspension tracker that's not just within the transfers section.From your written answers
Live news feed
FDR
Player comparison
Transfer planner
Set-piece dash
Price predictor
Stuck on lineups
74%
56%
60%
55%
56%
27%
Transfers
67%
59%
61%
56%
53%
25%
Chips / wildcards
72%
60%
62%
57%
56%
25%
BWSL2 players
69%
55%
56%
59%
59%
28%
Captain pick
57%
48%
55%
51%
45%
18%
Price changes
66%
58%
48%
54%
64%
48%
20%
40%
50%
60%
70%+
Two takeaways for the product roadmap. First: the live news feed is a horizontal solution, the single highest-leverage tool to ship. Second: most other tools have flat demand across pain groups, which means you can't just ship a few targeted tools and call it done. Build broad, not deep.
79%
The lineups problem
Of those stuck on lineups, more than three quarters want injury alerts on their own players.
71% want to know when an owned player has been rotated or dropped, and 39% want a suggested captain based on their squad. The pattern is consistent: this group doesn't just want lineup info, they want it filtered to their team and pushed to them. Solve this with personalisation, not editorial.
Theme #1 · Real-time accuracy on injury, availability and lineups
More info on players available or injured. Sometimes it says injured but then they are playing, so you miss out on the points because you sub them.
03Confidence & tools
What helps you feel confident picking players
A weekly "players to know" roundup wins outright.
65% · 25 points clear of #2
1
Weekly "players to know" roundup
65%
2
Club-by-club primers pre-season
40%
3
Manager and team style guides
36%
4
Player profile videos
26%
5
Where-to-watch recommendations
22%
5
Embedded BWSL2 highlights
22%
7
Dedicated BWSL2 podcast
15%
Tools you'd actually use · pick top 5
Five tools clear 50%. Then a sharp drop.
Live news feed leads on its own at 67%
1
Live injury & team news feed
67%
2
Player comparison tool
58%
3
Fixture difficulty rating
56%
4
Transfer planner (multi-GW)
55%
5
Set-piece taker dashboard
54%
6
Captain comparison
30%
7
Price change predictor
27%
8
Personalised notification centre
22%
9
End-of-season team review
18%
10
Effective ownership tracker
14%
11
Mini-league analytics
12%
12
"What if I'd captained X" replay
7%
The live news feed is the runaway, on its own at 67%. Player comparison, FDR, transfer planner and set-piece taker dashboard cluster behind it inside a tight 54–58% band, then there's a sharp drop to captain comparison at 30%. Build the news feed first, then the cluster.
An injury and suspension tracker that's not just within the transfers section.From your written answers
04Voices & alerts
Which voices you most want involved
Player perspective wins. Pundits don't.
63% want current & ex-players · 17 points clear of #2
1
Current and ex-players
63%
2
Managers and coaches
46%
3
Existing journalists
42%
4
Pundits and broadcasters
36%
5
Stats-led independents
31%
6
Community voices
23%
7
Fresh voices nobody knows yet
21%
8
Club content creators
19%
Top 3 are all on-pitch authority. Stats-led independents and community voices are mid-table, useful as an ensemble, but not as the lead.
Alerts you'd actually want
Two clear winners. Both about your players.
Only 3% want no alerts at all
1
Injury news for owned player
76%
2
Owned player rotated or dropped
68%
3
Suggested captain for your squad
36%
4
Captain reminder before deadline
35%
5
Rotation risk before fixture pile-up
32%
6
Price change for owned player
29%
7
Big price faller you might sell
22%
8
Mini-league overtake / close gap
11%
9
I don't want any alerts
3%
All seven of the most-wanted alerts are personalised to your squad. Generic "big news" alerts didn't make the top tier.
Theme #3 · A scout or trusted creator figure
An official "scout" would be a great feature. Someone who posts their team on the app each week, with their reasoning.
05The podcast, in detail
Of every content format we tested, the podcast pulled the most detailed open-text answers, the most named-creator references, and the most opinionated cross-tab data.
So we've gone deeper here than anywhere else in the survey.
Six lenses on the same question: demand strength, format choice, who hosts it, when to drop it, who you already trust, and the open-text shape of the format.
Podcast as a content format
Three quarters of you are open to a podcast. Just under a quarter aren't.
Before getting into what kind of podcast, the demand level itself. We asked you to rate podcasts as a format.
The split is healthy: a clear definitely-want core, a meaningful neutral middle, and a small but real not-interested tail.
This is real demand, big enough to commit a show to.
Definitely want one
41%
Your active podcast audience. Build the show for them first, expand reach second.
Neutral, could be persuaded
36%
Format-agnostic but content-curious. Win them with the right host, the right length, the right slot.
Not interested at all
23%
A real audience to respect. Make sure podcast-only content has a written or visual sibling.
Percentages of the 87% of respondents who rated podcasts as a format.
If we launched a single weekly fantasy podcast
Tactical breakdown wins by more than half the vote.
Among everyone who answered (regardless of how strongly they said they want a podcast), the type they'd want is unambiguous. Tactical decision-support. Wider leagues chat moves narrowly into second, with stats deep-dives in third. Manager and player interviews score 10%. Community mini-league stories barely register.
55%
tactical
breakdown
breakdown
Tactical breakdown of captaincy, transfers, picks55%
Wider leagues chat with fantasy weaved in19%
Stats and data deep-dives16%
Manager and player interviews10%
Community mini-league stories1%
A clear ask. The show should be tactical and decision-focused, helping you choose what to do with your team, rather than wider chat or interviews. The official FPL podcast was referenced repeatedly in your written answers as the benchmark.
The official FPL podcast is great, I listen to it all the time and it gives great insight into each week. This would be a really good addition for the WSL to make.From your written answers
Voices × podcast type
Each show type pulls a different voice mix.
The same respondents who chose a podcast type also told us which voices they wanted. Cross-tabbing the two reveals the real shape of each show.
An interviews show pulls hard towards on-pitch authority: 84% want current and ex-players, 66% want managers and coaches, but just 12% want community voices.
A tactical show is the big-tent option: 72% players, 55% managers, 52% journalists, 43% pundits. Every category clears the bar.
Across every show type, current and ex-players are the universal anchor (64–84%).
Tactical (55%)
Wider (19%)
Stats (16%)
Interviews (10%)
Current and ex-players
72%
80%
64%
84%
Managers and coaches
55%
52%
44%
66%
Existing journalists
52%
52%
42%
34%
Pundits and broadcasters
43%
42%
48%
31%
Stats-led independents
40%
35%
38%
22%
Community voices
29%
33%
18%
12%
20%
40%
50%
60%
70%+
If we go tactical (the consensus pick), the host mix should be current and ex-players first, with managers and journalists as the supporting acts. Stats-led independents and community voices belong in supplementary roles, not as the lead format.
Day-of-week consumption: podcast-definitely group
Pod-definitely wanters skew daily, and skew Sunday.
The 35% who definitely want a podcast aren't just any group. They're already heavy weekly consumers.
Each row compares the average across all respondents (dark) against the pod-definitely group (gradient).
The daily-consumption gap is the headline: 50% of the pod-definitely group would consume content every day, against 38% of the average. A 13-point lift, the largest gap on the board.
Friday and Sunday/Monday round out the over-index. A pod-definitely listener is your weekly heavy consumer, and a Sunday or Monday review window has more pull for them than for everyone else.
Daily, every day of the week
Pod-def +13 ppts
Average
38%
Pod-def
50%
Friday, deadline prep
Pod-def +8 ppts
Average
47%
Pod-def
55%
Sunday, reactions and aftermath
Pod-def +6 ppts
Average
11%
Pod-def
17%
Matchday, rolling updates
Pod-def +6 ppts
Average
23%
Pod-def
29%
Monday, gameweek review
Pod-def +6 ppts
Average
23%
Pod-def
29%
Average across all respondents The 35% who definitely want a podcast ppts = percentage points
Two slot recommendations follow from this. A Friday deadline-prep show, riding the broad Friday peak. And a Sunday or Monday review show, where the pod-definitely group's appetite is sharpest and the wider audience won't be there yet anyway.
The voices and outlets you named
A familiar mix: ex-players, journalists, podcasts and creators.
We asked who you currently trust most for women's football analysis and opinion (optional, open text). The names you wrote in cluster across four broadly familiar groups, with notable overlap to the voices preferences earlier in the report. Listed below in the order they were named, not ranked.
Ex-players & pundits
Alex ScottAnita AsanteEllen WhiteEni AlukoFara WilliamsIan WrightJen BeattieKaren CarneyLucy WardSteph Houghton
Journalists & outlets
BBCJacqui OatleyMolly HudsonSky SportsSuzy WrackThe AthleticThe GuardianTim StillmanTom Garry
Podcasts & shows
Big Kick EnergyCounter PressedDecoding the WSLHalfway LineHometown GloryThe Offside Rule
Creators
Fwsl_jonoGuy McCombejacobbern14pulsewosoSchurrle_FWSLstattorinoSubToTWFCTom Maher (TOMMAHERSY)
Names taken from the open-text question on who you currently trust for women's football analysis and opinion. Categories applied by us, listed alphabetically within each group rather than ranked. The full list is longer than the names shown here.
Format ideas from your written answers
Ideas you're bringing to the table.
Your open-text answers gave us a remarkable amount of detail on what a podcast could look like. Three threads keep coming up: a clear length cap, a specific weekly cadence (usually a preview plus a review), and host quality as the make-or-break variable. Below: your thinking, in your own words. Ours to read alongside the data and combine with our own.
Length & cadence
Under 30 minutes. A Friday preview, a Monday review.
A podcast of around 45 minutes to preview the week's matches on a Thursday or Friday. Maybe also a Monday review show of 30 minutes.
Podcast or video available by Tuesday morning each week, no more than 30 minutes long, covering all the major highlights of the previous gameweek and updates or tips for the next one.
Match reports with facts and stats on a Monday. Preview with players to watch and updated injury and suspension news on a Friday.
A 5-20 minute addition to the WSL show on Sunday or Monday night, after the highlights.
Host & vibe
Knowledgeable. Engaging. Familiar.
Host and vibe for sure.
Engaging and knowledgeable hosts are necessary for podcasts and video.
A good podcast or video with familiar hosts or retired players who have a good knowledge of football and can give good insights. I love Steph and Ian's podcast and Karen and Jill for these reasons.
For a podcast, decent knowledge and analysis. More Counter Pressed, less Big Kick Energy.
Content focus
Decision support, not chat.
Podcasts: transfer tips, chip strategy, differential picks, fixture scheduling.
Key info that would help me make decisions on transfers and captaincy. Mainly availability and likelihood of scoring points.
Suggested teams and when best to play chips, from expert players, and captain suggestions.
Tactics with player performance, stats, coach interviews. Up-and-coming coaches, that kind of depth.
A podcast with an analytics or fantasy football nerd who is new to the WSL, and a WSL expert who is new to fantasy sport. Both learning from one another.From the "do something nobody else is doing" question
Pulling your direction together
The shape of what you've told us, in seven lines.
Six cards of evidence collapse into one direction-of-travel summary. Every line below is anchored to a finding above. This isn't the spec. It's the audience signal we'll combine with our own thinking, our editorial judgement and what's commercially viable, to shape what we eventually build.
01
Format: tactical decision-support
Captaincy, transfers, picks. Not interviews, not wider chat. 55% of you chose this, more than 2.5× any other format.
02
Length: under 30 minutes
The open-text consensus is sharp. 20 to 30 minutes is the cap. Some happy at 45, but never longer.
03
Cadence: weekly, two-touch
A Friday deadline-prep show riding the broad pre-deadline peak (47% want Friday content, the standalone weekday peak). Plus a Sunday or Monday review where the pod-definitely group over-indexes by six points.
04
Hosts: two ex-players, anchored
Current and ex-players are the universal anchor across every show type (72% tactical, 84% interviews). Familiar, knowledgeable, engaging, in your words.
05
Supporting cast: a journalist + a creator
Existing journalists score 52% in tactical. Beyond that: a familiar mix of ex-players, journalists, creators and podcasts already covers women's football. Read the named-voices section as context for who you'd be entering a conversation alongside.
06
Companion content: written and visual
23% of you said you don't want a podcast at all. Every podcast-only segment needs a written or short-video sibling so we don't lose them.
07
Benchmark: the official FPL show
Named more than any other reference point in your written answers. Tactical, weekly, made by the people running the game. That's the bar.
06Going further
Less conventional content ideas you'd back
An awards show & a beginner's track lead the unconventional pack.
1
End-of-season fantasy awards show
39%
2
A "beginner's track" for first-timers
35%
3
Pre-season interactive draft show
32%
4
Reader-submitted team-of-the-week
28%
5
"Lazy manager" track for set-and-forget
23%
6
Watch-along streams with fantasy overlay
20%
7
Live community vote on weekly picks
18%
8
Monthly AMA with a club manager
18%
9
Discord office hours with editorial team
9%
Worth flagging: the "beginner's track" at 35% maps directly to the open-text feedback that R1 missed proper onboarding. There's a real audience for it.
A note on BWSL2
A pain point, but not a content category.
33% of you said understanding BWSL2 players is a top-3 pain point, the fourth-biggest gap overall.
But that group barely diverges from the average on what content they want.
The biggest lifts: +9 percentage points on embedded BWSL2 highlights, +7 on a dedicated BWSL2 podcast. Notable, not transformative.
It would be good to have some kind of advice or tips available, things like regular articles or a podcast dedicated to the game.From your written answers
Embedded BWSL2 highlights
BWSL2-stuck +9 ppts
Average
22%
Stuck
31%
Dedicated BWSL2 podcast
BWSL2-stuck +7 ppts
Average
15%
Stuck
22%
Club-by-club primers pre-season
BWSL2-stuck +3 ppts
Average
40%
Stuck
43%
Manager and team style guides
BWSL2-stuck +2 ppts
Average
36%
Stuck
38%
Where-to-watch recommendations
BWSL2-stuck +1 ppts
Average
22%
Stuck
23%
Average across all respondents The 33% stuck on BWSL2 ppts = percentage points
Reading: people stuck on BWSL2 want it folded into the main product (highlights, podcast, primers), not parked in a separate content track. Build it as context, not a category.
Almost nobody wants pure entertainment.
When we asked you to articulate the difference between fantasy content that changes your decisions and content you'd read or watch just for fun, the signal was unmistakeable.
60%
Mentioned decision-changing content
Lineups, injury news, stats, expert tips, transfer advice, captain calls. Content that helps you actually pick and play.
1%
Mentioned just-for-fun content alone
Almost no respondent named entertainment-only content as their primary interest. Fun content earned its place alongside utility, not in place of it.
07Your wishlist
The single piece of content nobody is making
No single ask. Five clusters of confirmation, plus a handful of genuine novel ideas.
This was the survey's last question and the most-answered open text. 66% of you wrote in (243 responses), the highest engagement of any open text in the survey.
There's no dominant ask. The wishlist breaks across five clusters that confirm the rest of the report, plus a long tail of distinctive ideas worth flagging.
Treat this as a confirmation of direction with a few standout outliers, not a redirect.
27asks
Decision support & forecasting
Multi week simulator so you can draft for 3/4 games forward.
An AI helper that can provide suggestions for next gameweek personalised to your current team selection.
Form guide, rather than a list of all players. Who is hot and who is not right now.
20asks
Stats & data exploration
A coherent platform bringing the data sources together.
Stats on fantasy value for players across seasons so up and coming players can be identified.
Data-specific analysis of fantasy picks. The best xG per position.
17asks
Live availability info
An injury and suspension tracker that's not just within the transfers section.
I need to know who is looking good in training.
More consistent and frequent injury updates and rotation predictions.
16asks
Audio & weekly cadence
A pre-weekend podcast and a weekend review podcast.
A women's fantasy show that talks you through the gameweek with fantasy experts to help you choose your team.
Just a platform where the game is treated with respect. A podcast or YouTube channel where players can discuss and share their opinions and ideas.
11asks
Player-led & community
Captains and players from clubs picking players from their squad they'd add to their fantasy teams.
Interview deep-dives with users currently towards the top of the leaderboards explaining how they play the game and their decision-making.
Bigger deal of weekly top-five teams. It's an accomplishment, it would feel amazing to be recognized.
The novel asks worth flagging
Six ideas that don't fit any cluster, and a few stand out as commercially interesting.
"What if" stats for players you sold or subbed.
A draft league where each player can only be owned by one person.
A watch list with notifications on player values, sort of like a private checklist.
Game planner so you can see in one place when there will be double gameweeks, when teams won't have games, etc.
Bonus points for picking manager of the month in both BWSL and BWSL2.
A WSL-style reboot of Fantasy Football League or MOTDX.
The clusters above match the spine of the rest of this report: live information, decision support, stats access, audio cadence, and a player- or community-led layer on top. The novel asks are a separate beast: features (multi-week simulator, draft format, watch list) and editorial premises (Soccer Saturday-style show, weekly fan head-to-heads).
In your written answers, one theme dominated.
When we asked what's missing from women's football fantasy content today, you wrote in. We coded every response. Here's what came back, ordered by how often each theme showed up.
08What you keep telling us
We coded every written answer and grouped recurring requests into broader themes. Four came back consistently. The first dominates by a wide margin.
25%of written answers
Real-time accuracy on injury, availability and lineups
By far the most-mentioned editorial gap, and the single strongest written-answer signal in the survey. Long-term injuries that aren't reflected in fantasy data, ambiguous availability, news scattered across club channels, press conferences behind paywalls.
More accurate injury updates. Often a player is not flagged at all but has a long-term injury that has been reported, but the fantasy content hasn't included it.
Lack of full injury news from teams, especially when some teams' press conferences are behind paywalls or not broadcast.
More info on players available or injured. Sometimes it says injured but then they are playing, so you miss out on the points because you sub them.
Earliest player availability reports in relation to player injuries, squad inclusion, starting team news.
#1
13%of written answers
Stats and data depth
"Better stats", "in-depth stats", "player analytics". This theme jumped past Scout into second place with the latest responses. The signal matches the format Likert: 81% want in-game stats. Both data sources point in the same direction.
There's no where to view statistics of the current season and how many points players have from goals, clean sheets etc. This needs to be easy to view and not cover just the previous week.
Detailed stats for player comparison and transparency on price changes.
Data-specific analysis of fantasy picks. For example, best xG per position.
#2
10%of written answers
A scout or trusted creator figure
Multiple references to "The Scout" model from FPL. You want named, recurring expert voices weaving through the season, sharing their team, their picks, their reasoning, not anonymous editorial.
An official "scout" would be a great feature. Someone who posts their team on the app each week.
Best players to pick going into the gameweek. Like FPL does with "The Scout".
I really like some social media users who predict line-ups, give tips on who to transfer in or out, and make suggestions on when to use chips. Having multiple informed people with different ideas helps me make my own choices.
#3
10%of written answers
A weekly tactical podcast or roundup
Direct, named references to the official Fantasy Premier League podcast (and FPL Blackbox) as the benchmark, alongside requests for a weekly wrap-up of who scored, who underperformed, and which hidden gems to bring in next. Same content, two phrasings.
Something like the official FPL podcast and the other things the Premier League produces for FPL.
The official FPL podcast is great, I listen to it all the time and it gives great insight into each week. This would be a really good addition for the WSL to make.
A weekly wrap-up of the weekend's results. Who were the players with high performance points, the hidden gems, and which teams or players underperformed.
A 20 to 30 minute weekly podcast reviewing the previous gameweek and looking ahead to the next.
#4
09In your own words
A proper game made by the official franchise.
Content creation in general. I love looking at FDRs and hearing other people's opinions, transfer plans and strategy.
An injury and suspension tracker that's not just within the transfers section.
A 20-30 minute weekly podcast reviewing the previous gameweek and looking ahead to the next.
An ability to change between subs and starting eleven throughout the gameweek.
More flexibility in transfer values, making it more dynamic for a player in good or bad form.
Content creators who share tips and advice for every gameweek throughout the season.
A centralised place for press conference news related to player availability.
Detailed analysis of what could be improved with your picks. Areas for development, like a coach.
Short-form video content on who are good options for transfers and captains.
There is already a good network of fantasy content creators on X such as Joe and Jono.
With the fantasy last season there was basically no intro to how it works. It assumed previous knowledge of the men's game.
Coming up
Next survey: shaping community